Not sure why you got a negative one on this but you speak truth that a lot of people don't want to hear.

The fact of the matter is that AIG should've been left to fail... risk/reward and all...

What Spitzer is trying to do, even though he is tainted by his past actions is correct. Find out who knew what and when and did it violate the law. There are a lot of shenanigans to uncover and the jail should be full of white collar crooks who abused the systm and the taxpayers.

The fact that bailed out firms sold this garbage AND BET AGAINST IT should tell us all we need to know. The fact that this jackass Stone thinks that Spizer is at fault for the risky behavior with subprime tells us all we need to know about him. The word idiot isn't quite strong enough.

The greatest danger to the movement is to embrace a party outright.

Both the Republicans and Democrats told us wonderful stories while destroying the economy and our liberties.

Wasn't there a dustup about the efficacy of the tests that she didn't get because she didn't have healthcare?

I don't necessarily know if this is relevant to the discussion but I'm going to be sad when the global warming debate finally runs it's course. A lot of people made a lot of money off it... But a whole lot of people are going to lose a whole hell of a lot when the research money and the subsequent contracts dry up.

It's going to be a big drag on the already faltering economy. I know it has to happen and logically I welcome, even encourage it. It's like when you need to get a "colonic-colada"... You enter with trepidation and a little bit of fear. You clench your teeth and bear it and in the end, you're a better person for it.

But when it's truly over, we'll have lost a means of easy access to easy, sexy hippies.

Nor do you have to read my comments... That's what freedom is all about.

Great post LIR,

This article is the flip side of the KOS coin and quite frankly has nothing to do with journalism and everything to do with petty sniping to whip up a little good old time religious fervor.

It is certainly beneath what should be very high standards for a site such as this. Any connection with "journalism" is a stretch, unless one considers "TMZ" or "Star" journalism.

There is much to report on with this man... Far more important than if or when he observes his religion.

My beef with the content and placement of the article is that it's the wrong subject and the wrong place and quite frankly, it's a petty, small article.

We have more than enough pettiness in journalism. Wallowing in it detracts from the promise a site like this brings.

But... It's not my site, it's Mr. Breitbart's. If he chooses to include this sort of petty nonsense it's his choice.

Question for Breitbart...

I deeply respect the goal of the "Big" sites. As a fiscal conservative, and as a citizen who is fed up with government intrusion, I am extremely appreciative of the forum that you have provided.

For the life of me, I can't see why this site would host such irrelevant, sniping, idiotic pieces. So what if he hasn't been to church in a year, in a decade, or ever?

What does that have to do with "Big Journalism"?

"Who is this kid?"

Kid is the operative word here. This essay is not particularly deep.

That was less a "punch back" than a wildly flailing tantrum. :)

But I agree that this list displays his lack of depth in the field. It's an amateurish high school essay at best.