B33
41p50 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0
16 years ago @ /Film - Fox Announces Fall TV ... · 0 replies · +1 points
17 years ago @ /Film - The Wolfman Is Getting... · 0 replies · +1 points
But the gradual development into the full fledged form would take shots of the fur coming in, the face developing into a wolf life form, the eyes changing, and the body shifting, correct? I suppose they could just do quick shots of various stages of make-up with a transforming CGI face, but they could have very well just replaced the entire actor with CGI, as well...
I know he cited the "teeth" in the mouth as an example of one of the flaws the production studio had with the rough draft. Wasn't aware of the "stretching mouth," but that wouldn't surprise me, in all honesty.
At any rate, here's my source: http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2008/07/27/cgi-wolf-man...
Granted, the article is just under a year old and the state of it could have very well changed by now, but it's still something to keep in mind, regardless.
17 years ago @ /Film - The Wolfman Is Getting... · 2 replies · +1 points
He also didn't have much guidance with the studio heading the CGI with the transformations and did notice flaws with it upon visiting the company and viewing a rough draft.
Whether that is still the case or not is unknown.
17 years ago @ /Film - David Slade Responds t... · 0 replies · +1 points
17 years ago @ /Film - The Road Will Finally ... · 0 replies · +1 points
17 years ago @ /Film - New Live-Action Teenag... · 1 reply · +1 points
17 years ago @ /Film - Trick R Treat Finally ... · 0 replies · +1 points
This a horror film that essentially serves as a tribute to the holiday that contributed towards the foundation of the genre itself. It's a film that wants the viewer to actually enjoy it rather than be disgusted by it. And it "dares" to try something new in the endless proverbial "sea" of waste the horror industry has sadly sunk to.
I find it rather pathetic that a film such as "Trick 'r Treat" can't garner a theatrical release, yet the next horribly crafted "Saw" film or another piss poor remake is just around the corner.
17 years ago @ /Film - Wolverine: Running Tim... · 0 replies · +4 points
17 years ago @ /Film - Joss Whedon on Dollhou... · 0 replies · +1 points
Swift jabs aside, there's a sense of frustration with corporate executives when they conduct impulsively induced decisions strictly based upon the grounds of "numbers."
I understand that the studio is running a business and it has to make decisions for the good of the company. Decisions worth a rather large sum of money, might I add. But the integrity and quality of the company needs to also be taken into consideration.
With that said, corporate greed has repeatedly stamped on the notion of "quality" over and over again. It's an unfortunate "staple" to the industry.
But I suppose it really comes down to the question, what would Fox really replace the series with? And what if the series went on to be quite successful and just had a bit of a rocky start? Case in point, NBC's The Office.
The series seems fairly interesting and it'd be foolish to proverbially "pull the rug out" from underneath its continuance.
I say give it another shot and see what transpires. If the ratings dwindle to a crippling number and the quality declines, then cancel it. But if both soar, then it's a success that could have been cut down prematurely.
17 years ago @ /Film - Gavin Hood Disputes Wo... · 0 replies · +1 points