<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/516017</link>
		<description>Comments by Annieflies</description>
<item>
<title>Big Journalism : 500 Tea Party Protesters Storm a Government Building, Take Hostages</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/rb/2011/09/10/500-tea-party-protesters-storm-a-government-building-take-hostages/#IDComment191897375</link>
<description>Wonder how many times this headline will be posted as truth because the lazy leftards were too busy fist-pumping to actually READ the full article.  You&amp;#039;re right, I haven&amp;#039;t seen this ANYWHERE, thanks for uncovering the truth. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 12:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/rb/2011/09/10/500-tea-party-protesters-storm-a-government-building-take-hostages/#IDComment191897375</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://norfolk.wtkr.com/ : Bear attacks horse in Chesapeake | News | Chesapeake News</title>
<link>http://chesapeake.wtkr.com/news/news/bear-attacks-horse-chesapeake/51064#IDComment166148831</link>
<description>WHERE in Chesapeake???? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://chesapeake.wtkr.com/news/news/bear-attacks-horse-chesapeake/51064#IDComment166148831</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The Black Sphere : Kansas City Containing Minorities</title>
<link>http://theblacksphere.net/kc-containing-minorities/#IDComment159997071</link>
<description>I thank God for you, Kevin.  Cleaver is an embarrassment to KCians.  I fear for these &amp;#039;rookies&amp;#039; as well, and this only portends some sort of race riots in the near future.  How did my beloved KC turn into such a mess??  We live on the east coast now, but have considered moving back some day.  It sure won&amp;#039;t be to the city, that&amp;#039;s for sure. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Jun 2011 12:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://theblacksphere.net/kc-containing-minorities/#IDComment159997071</guid>
</item><item>
<title>WAVY.com : Va. General Assembly passes $80M budget|WAV.com|Richmond</title>
<link>http://www.wavy.com/dpp/news/local_news/va.-general-assembly-passes-$80m-budget#IDComment131230671</link>
<description>&amp;#039;Democrat&amp;#039; governor??  last time I checked he was a Republican.... </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 03:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.wavy.com/dpp/news/local_news/va.-general-assembly-passes-$80m-budget#IDComment131230671</guid>
</item><item>
<title>ProjectVirginia : Privatizing Virginia&#039;s Liquor Stores</title>
<link>http://projectvirginia.com/privatizing-virginias-liquor-stores/#IDComment87323719</link>
<description>Facts are that there are zero differences in alcohol related traffic fatality and accident stats between states that have privatized alcohol stores and state run ones.  I have a hard time believing that abc stores even make a profit when gov&amp;#039;t run, probably don&amp;#039;t break even after paying &amp;#039;state employee&amp;#039; wages and benefits, as compared to say &amp;#039;grocery store clerk&amp;#039; wages.  I would be interested to see the numbers on that.  Also, as a christian I don&amp;#039;t see why the &amp;#039;faith based groups&amp;#039; are even at the table here.  Are they concerned about alcohol usage increasing if privatization occurs?  I would be more concerned that my tax dollars are directly underwriting the sale of liquor.  Privatize it and let free trade work.  Va doesn&amp;#039;t need to be in the liquor business. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 16:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://projectvirginia.com/privatizing-virginias-liquor-stores/#IDComment87323719</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : 5 Politically Incorrect Parenting Conversations to Have With Your Teen Over the Twilight Saga</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/07/10/politically-incorrect-parenting-101-use-the-culture-to-impart-truth-take-your-daughter-to-see-the-twilight-saga/#IDComment86072669</link>
<description>thank you for a great analysis, and a great weapon, ahem, tool, that i can use with my daughters in my &amp;#039;defense against the dark arts&amp;#039; class, lol.  I am under great pressure to allow them to see this movie series, that it is &amp;#039;harmless&amp;#039;, that I am only making them resent me.  my argument is this... if i do watch it, what good will it do me?  if i don&amp;#039;t watch it, what harm will it do me?  and vice versa.  you are correct, it has everything to do with culture.  the culture that incrementally desensitizes us to evil in the world around us, it warps our worldview.  my particular issue with this series, which btw i have not read,  but have done some research on, is the overly emotional pull it is exerting on otherwise perfectly rational women around me.  i&amp;#039;m talking about the adults!!  that, and the last book, which does have sex scenes in it, which even if they gloss over that in the final movie (and you know there&amp;#039;ll be one, too much $$ to be made), the girls minds are already captured.  I can hear it now, &amp;quot;but mom!  you let me read/see all the rest of them, why not this one!??&amp;quot;  that&amp;#039;s a freight train you just may not be able to stop.  perhaps when they are much older (my oldest 2 are 12 and 10) we can sit down and see these movies for what they are, but for now I am just going to have to remain the bad guy, i guess. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 06:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/07/10/politically-incorrect-parenting-101-use-the-culture-to-impart-truth-take-your-daughter-to-see-the-twilight-saga/#IDComment86072669</guid>
</item><item>
<title>ProjectVirginia : VA’s Congressional Campaign Twitter Breakdown (Part Two)</title>
<link>http://projectvirginia.com/va%e2%80%99s-congressional-campaign-twitter-breakdown-part-two/#IDComment83948592</link>
<description>I am in Randy Forbes&amp;#039; district and have been following him on a different account, @Randy_Forbes since the day he got the account.  This original account has 2,846 Followers, he is Following 488, he is Listed 298 times, and has had 247 Tweets since the inception of the account in March of 09.  The @Randy_Forbes account is Verified, and is the one that is linked to on his webpage.  Please adjust your analysis accordingly, thanks!  This is a great service to the voters and the candidates, and I look forward to the next installment!</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Jul 2010 21:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://projectvirginia.com/va%e2%80%99s-congressional-campaign-twitter-breakdown-part-two/#IDComment83948592</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Charges reduced in phone caper at senator\&#039;s office</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9EMHBHG1&show_article=1#IDComment64248703</link>
<description>good news James!  the truth will out! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9EMHBHG1&show_article=1#IDComment64248703</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Lonewolf Diaries: Kevin Jonas Insults His Wife and Damages the Abstinence Crusade</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/scrowder/2010/02/02/lonewolf-diaries-kevin-jonas-the-anti-sexual-moron/#IDComment55110280</link>
<description>Steven, perhaps you were a sexual expert your first time out, but I admire this young man for being painfully honest.  Your snark und condescension is really offputting.  Shame on you for using this young couple&amp;#039;s admission for your personal aggrandizement, and the whole &amp;quot;she should be offended&amp;quot; bit is just you projecting.  Find something more substantial to whine about next time. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Feb 2010 01:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/scrowder/2010/02/02/lonewolf-diaries-kevin-jonas-the-anti-sexual-moron/#IDComment55110280</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : A Name Americans Should Know - Jodie Evans and the Obama-Hollywood-Terrorist Connection</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/taylorking/2009/10/23/a-name-americans-should-know-jodie-evans-and-the-obama-hollywood-terrorist-connection/#IDComment40346566</link>
<description>No Lloyd, we haven&amp;#039;t reached the point of no return YET, but we are screaming towards it at warp speed with no brakes and no hands on the wheel.  It is just a matter of time, and that time will be here sooner than you think, namely in December when that person occupying the office of the President signs away our sovereignty, effectively nullifying our Constitution.  Lord Monckton was right, America, it&amp;#039;s been nice knowing you. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 02:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/taylorking/2009/10/23/a-name-americans-should-know-jodie-evans-and-the-obama-hollywood-terrorist-connection/#IDComment40346566</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : SC governor to return to work after mystery trip</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D990M2B80#IDComment25270029</link>
<description>Must be a slooooww newsday in SC?  Who the hell cares that the Gov took a few days off?  Why does some so-called reporter &amp;#039;need&amp;#039; to know where he is at every moment of every day?  I am sure that if his staffers REALLY needed to get ahold of him they could have, they were just giving him an undisturbed break.  Plus, he did cut short his trip, right?  Just because some whiny news-hounds didn&amp;#039;t get the answers they wanted in less than 9 hours time?  Give me a break.  Isn&amp;#039;t there anything worthwhile to report on?  The only people who would get their panties in a wad over the possibility that there &amp;#039;might be an emergency&amp;#039; that the actual Governor of a state would HAVE to be there to handle physically, IN PERSON (I can&amp;#039;t imagine what that might be aside from donating a kidney or bone marrow?) are the same folks who think the only solution to any problem can be solved by the government.  Wusses. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 01:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D990M2B80#IDComment25270029</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Everyday Normal Republicans (With Special Guest: Zo!)</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/scrowder/2009/06/11/everyday-normal-republicans-a-crowder-and-zo-special/#IDComment24006775</link>
<description>Zo, once again you rock.  and that other guy too!  I vote for Red Eye as well! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 05:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/scrowder/2009/06/11/everyday-normal-republicans-a-crowder-and-zo-special/#IDComment24006775</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>