Did Maxine "James Brown" Water's say "target" what's with all the violent talk Maxine? What's with the divisive language?

She stole it from James Brown.

Wonder if it has anything to do with the Anti American, Anti Obama protest in Brazil??? http://www.verumserum.com/?p=22726 Leftists Protest, Firebomb US Consulate in Brazil Ahead of Obama Visit

How does one type to Tweet with those great big fat Hamburger Helper hands?

OK let's be fair and not pick and choose which documentaries we want to believe from this guy... this is the same guy that made "An Inconvenient Truth" that most all conservatives slammed as bunk and BS... so why while I agree 100% public schools are in shambles and for the most part a joke, we need to remember this is the guy that made Al Gore's movie so how fact based is it and how much is agenda based? I haven't seen the movie yet it's in my NetFlix queue so we'll see, I'm reserving judgment - I'm not going to praise or condemn the film just yet--- just because something echo's what I believe I need to see it first.

You might have noticed that Dana Commandatore left this little info fact out of her post - check his IMDB page for if you doubt me..

I believe it violates the equal protection clause in the constitution, you can not divide people up into classes.

Bottom line is Unions need to go, they\'ve served their purpose and now they are nothing more than thugs, like Obama.

Thanks for your reply Dan, as I've pointed out I have dyslexia and I make errors... point them out and I'll fix them... but arrogant asses like you don't take time to discovery that fact found on the "About" page, nope you just want to talk down to those that do not live up to your grammatical expectations. However based on you comment I'd say you are a lib that is nothing more than a poser that want to take cheap shots and run... seeing how you left no email address and opted for public criticism instead of the contact form.

But I'm man enough to approve your jejune post and move on. Have a nice day.

Note to reader... Dan make several charges and fails to cite a single example, thus revealing himself as a poser.

Fixed it you typed and not

My bubble is just fine.

The thing is you just don’t get it. You attack offset because people are taking voluntary action on something you disagree with. In this case, it is the government receiving a donation from a non-profit that has caught your wrath. You think that the government should do nothing that you disagree with.

Caught my wrath? No, I can point you in the direction of those that have really caught my wrath... this is nothing.

Well guess what, they do lots of things I disagree with. They give billions to the coal and oil industry in direct and indirect subsidies. They support wars that I don’t personally agree with that cost tax payers billions and cost people their lives. But the government also ensures that I get clean water, that I have roads to travel on and all sorts of other services that I want. So I take it all with a grain of salt. That opinions must be balanced, nothing will be perfect, and the United States of America wasn’t design to make me personally happy.

Ask yourself how you life would be with oil and coal, would you have a car, a computer, all the modern niceties brought about by the industrial revolution fueled by oil and coal. Would you prefer we revert back to the 1850's before the combustion engine and electricity? I'll pass as I dealt with that in an ice storm a year ago. (Guess global warming caused it?)

You can cite scientific studies all you want or articles about how the earth isn’t warming. If you look hard enough I bet that you can still to this day find a scientist that states that white people are superior to blacks or that phrenology is an appropriate way to measure aptitude.

Now this is a typical race baiting remark, really aren't you above that? It hasn't a damn thing to do with the topic. As for phrenology I place that on same line as climate science.

But you know damn well that the preponderance of the evidence is on the side of the global warming supporters. I won’t deny that there are valid scientific opinions that state otherwise, but you can find 10 scientists that support man made global warming for every one that is against it.

What preponderance of the evidence? Oh that's rich! Would that be the evidence from East Anglia's climate-gate University? Would that be sampling of three trees in Siberia and establishing a trend? Would that be the cherry picking data to suit and agenda? As for tens of thousands of scientist supporting global warming I can give you a list of ten of thousands of scientist that call it a scam. (Over 31,000 to be exact.)

Sometimes I like to compare the threat of global warming to the threat of your house burning up. Will your house burn down? That is very, very unlikely. But we still have fire insurance. It is because of that .0001% chance that it will happen to us that we take action today.

Sounds great but you have fire insurance because if you have a mortgage you are required to have it, it's not to protect you it's to protect the investment of the mortgage company. Surely you are bright enough to know that. Then again my fire insurance isn't estimated to cost $57 trillion, which is the estimate for fighting global warming. You can take it to the bank, if my fire insurance was 4 times my household GDP I'd have to risk it. (US GDP is 14.2 T)

Why do we treat the climate differently. I mean, are you seriously convinced that there is a 0% chance that climate change is real? You are seriously telling me that literally tens of thousands of scientists, governments from all over the world including ours, businesses, individuals are all being duped by a giant conspiracy?

No climate change is real it's called seasons where I’m from. Yesterday was cold and sunny, today it's frigid and snowing... the climate changed, it happens. As for the loony lemmings on the left that have a need to jump on the global warming band wagon do you really believe that they do that because they care, or is it because they want to appear they care while they jet around in private planes and enjoy limousine lifestyles... it's the chic of the moment and this to will pass. You need look no further than Al Gore.

I don't do conspiracies, however I do identify hypocrisy and lemming and call them out.

You are free to believe whatever you want, but rationally, there is no way to look at all this and say there is a 0% chance global warming is real. And if there is even a chance that it is real, I think we should take action.

You wanna bet? Here is the deal; you have roughly the last 160 years of climate data records on a planet that is over five billion years old. You seem to like numbers so that's a sample size of 0.000000032% of the history of the world, not exactly a large enough of a sample rate to be reliable. That is a kin to taking a pinch of sand from a single beach and saying every beach in the world is like this tiny pinch. It's insane to think you can predict a trend based on such tiny sample size. Do something conservative and think logically for a minute and do the math.

What happened to the mini ice age in medieval times? What happened to the last ice age 10,000 years ago? What about the one before that and the one before that? Where did they go and what caused them to end? Was it the Knights Templar riding ruck-shot across Europe in SUV's? Or is it just a long climate cycle that occurs again and again? Which puts us right back in the lap of not enough data.

What actions should we take? Now that is where the real debate between people of differing opinions begins.

First thing use some damn common sense. Solar panels and wind turbines are not going to save the world... ask T. Boon Pickens who abandon the wind farm idea as not economically viable. If wind farms and solar farms were viable then we'd be using them and the tax payer wouldn't be funding there development and paying people to install them, I might note the manufacture in CHINA is coal fired and the manufacturing process as killed the river it dumps into for miles down stream. (I saw that on either the liberal Dicovery or NatGeo so you know it's true.) But you never see that, so you don't know that in order to go green on more side of the world the other side has to go brown.

What to do... skip this baby step technology of wind and solar and use the natural resources we have right here in the good ol USA and develop hydrogen power, hydrogen is renewable, it is green and it does not relay on the wind blowing or the sun shining. It could be the prefect form of energy.

I will not argue that dirty power is good; I try to take care of my environment... I try to conserve energy when possible, but I do not what to be lectured to from a bunch lemming in limos about how I've a flat-earther when they just don't have the data to prove their claims. All I ask is that common sense is used and right now this global warming/climate change hyperbole is lacking in both common sense and honest science.

It is ironic I'm debating global warming and it's 11 degrees outside and going down, additionally you'll be happy to know I'm burning wood and gas heat to stay warm and I'm toasty.

EDIT: If you reply start a new post as this is getting far to narrow.