Compare these facts:

1. The DC banned me, and my Intense Debate score is -70 (I only use that for Breitbart's sites).

2. I'm one of the very few who's willing and able to show how MMFA gets things wrong (which isn't the same as describing Brock's behavior and the rest in the DC report). I've written dozens of posts showing how MMFA misleads (see my site) and since 2003 or so I've left dozens of comments at MMFA showing how they're wrong. Only very rarely have I seen anyone else doing the same at their site.

Tip: try to fail less.

Oddly enough, no Breitbart sites seem to have covered what sharpshiny mentioned: Brown signed a bill that lets illegal aliens deprive citizens of college. You can see a list of other r/w bloggers who've also ignored that bill here:
http://24ahead.com/n/10845

Not only does that bill scr*w Americans, but it's unpopular and it's not difficult to discredit those who support it. Yet - oddly enough - Breitbart and others you rely seem to be ignoring it. Odd!

Correct me if I'm wrong, but no Breitbart sites seem to have covered the news that CA's governor signed a bill that lets illegal aliens deprive citizens of college:
http://24ahead.com/n/10845

See that link for a list of other r/w bloggers who haven't covered Brown signing that anti-American bill.

Odd how they focus on things like this and not unpopular, anti-American bills, isn't it?

Great video. All I did was provide a detailed explanation of why one of AttackWatch's pushbacks is wrong:

24ahead.com/n/10829

Of course, who cares about actually trying to intellectually engage ones' opponents? Ridicule is where it's at, as Mr. Alinsky would certainly remind us.

You know the immig. protests in Georgia? The leader of the main group behind them is a *former consul general of Mexico*:
http://24ahead.com/n/10760

A former official of the Mexican gov't is agitating his countrymen inside the U.S.

And, no one else seems to care. You'd think rightwing bloggers and teapartiers would be all over that story and would be willing to help me discredit an AP reporter who failed to note his past, but I can't get any help with that. Send emails or tweets to rightwing bloggers and ask them why they aren't all over that story and why they aren't helping me discredit an AP reporter.

I've left thousands of comments on hundreds of sites since 2002, and the only time I had to contact authorities about a reply I received was due to a reply on Althouse's blog.

Her commenters openly set out to get me to stop posting comments there, culminating in that. And, it was all under her watchful eye; she knew what was going on. In the past the comments at her site had been somewhat OK, but that all changed when Althouse decided to pander to the barely-sane tea parties types.

Riehl's buddy Instapundit also told me to "STFU"... while hiding behind a pseudonym like a little girl (I was able to determine the IP address he used).

So, please don't tell me about the new tone or civility: teaparty types are the most vile, most idiotic people I've ever seen online and off. What's described in the post is bad, but TPers aren't much better.

P.S. Because the above points out facts about TPers, expect them to respond with lies about me. Expect them to falsely assume that I support Shankman or am on his side; jumping to false conclusions is what they do because they have trouble thinking and they have little or no integrity. They aren't capable of making an argument; they don't even know what an argument is. So, they lie and smear. Ask them why they're following someone who joined with Soros to give millions to the ACLU; see: http://24ahead.com/n/10603

Calvin Freiburger is right to point out that there might be problems with the poll.

However, simply pointing out that there might be problems with the poll isn't going to solve this issue for the GOP, now is it? Because, whether the poll is off by 1 point or 10, a good % of the GOP are "Birthers". And, the MSM is going to keep on using that against the GOP.

So, if you're a GOP partisan, you have to do things in smarter ways:
http://24ahead.com/obama-opponents-still-helping-him

Congrats, you're even worse than Hillbuzz.

Speculation and wild theories just play right into the hands of those who smear anyone who has questions as a "Birther". But, hey, speculation and wild theories bring in the visitors, right?

The way to resolve this whole issue is to just tell the truth, and to point out that the "AntiBirthers" have problems telling the truth. Few are committed to doing the first, and almost no one besides me is doing the second. I've caught dozens of MSM reporters lying and misleading about the basic, indisputable facts of this matter and I've gotten no help with holding them accountable. That's despite how getting help with that could help reduce the sting of being called "Birthers" and could help force those reporters to do real reporting. This issue is a golden opportunity to discredit dozens of MSM reporters, but no one else is interested in that.

P.S. Here's a 1/09 interview with HI's gov that tends to cast doubt on whether he actually saw Baby O as he claims:
http://24ahead.com/n/10325

Rather than engaging in wild speculation about that, do things like publicly shaming reporters into asking HI's gov for specific instances where he saw Baby O.

I don't think it's that he's "bought off" so much that he just isn't that bright and he has low integrity.

If he were brighter he could handle this issue in a way that would at the least lessen the sting each time the MSM plays the "Birther card". And, all he has to do is just tell the truth:
http://24ahead.com/n/9350

Simply telling the truth is beyond those like Cantor because they can't even recognize the truth to begin with.

What's funny and sad about that list is that before the election I posted why to oppose Obama:
http://24ahead.com/n/8247

That was ignored by your leaders, when if they had promoted it they could have blocked him.

Now, those same leaders are telling you to join the teaparties and wave signs like little kids.

Hmmmmm...