<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0">	<channel>		<title>All Blog Comments</title>		<language>en-us</language>		<link>http://original.antiwar.com</link>		<description>All comments from Antiwar.com Original Articles</description><item>
<author>dmdeedee</author><title>dmdeedee - Caught With Our Pants Down in the Gulf</title><link>http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2016/01/14/caught-with-our-pants-down-in-the-gulf/#IDComment1010398857</link><description>Let&amp;#039;s all agree on the one major issue and that is, we were LIED to again.  Over and over again, the sheer propaganda we are fed is to be as useful as an old newspaper.  Nothing is as it seems and I mean nothing! And for Trump, he can buy advisers of the highest quality to give him real facts and opinion and strategies.  Unlike the present administration which get the crazy neocons opinions, knowledge and strategies.  All bent on war. </description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2016 19:06:01 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2016/01/14/caught-with-our-pants-down-in-the-gulf/#IDComment1010398857</guid></item><item>
<author>muggles</author><title>muggles - GOP Debates Are Pure Hawk Without&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;Paul</title><link>http://original.antiwar.com/lucy/2016/01/15/gop-debates-are-pure-hawk-without-a-paul/#IDComment1010398300</link><description>Libertarian Lite has never been a successful political strategy. As Rand&amp;#039;s father proved, it is the full strength version which can succeed. And that was decades ago when it started. There are far more libertarians now than then. And they know what it is for the most part. They don&amp;#039;t want low tax liberalism or conservatism.   Rand has never labeled himself a libertarian; content to let others describe him as one, sort of. That is deliberate. Perhaps he&amp;#039;s not. So I don&amp;#039;t judge him by his father&amp;#039;s standard. That being said Lucy&amp;#039;s essay above makes the right points. Judged by a non libertarian standard, he&amp;#039;s clearly better than the rest on war and peace. Not libertarian, but better.   But it is impossible to rally the troops for an election by being &amp;quot;less bad&amp;quot; than the rest. Hence he tries to emulate the emotional fervor of his dad&amp;#039;s supporters without having those principles clearly articulated (or even discussed, many times). If I ever had received ANY fundraising material which addressed &amp;quot;libertarians and conservatives&amp;quot; I might have donated. But no, none. Hence no donation. </description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2016 18:56:32 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://original.antiwar.com/lucy/2016/01/15/gop-debates-are-pure-hawk-without-a-paul/#IDComment1010398300</guid></item><item>
<author>rosemerry</author><title>rosemerry - Australia PM Visits Iraq as 44 Are Killed</title><link>http://original.antiwar.com/updates/2016/01/16/australia-pm-visits-iraq-as-44-are-killed/#IDComment1010393105</link><description>What on earth are Aussie troops doing in Iraq???? it was bad enough to join the coalition of the killing in 2003, but thirteen years later???? </description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2016 17:23:07 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://original.antiwar.com/updates/2016/01/16/australia-pm-visits-iraq-as-44-are-killed/#IDComment1010393105</guid></item><item>
<author>rosemerry</author><title>rosemerry - US Foreign Policy Discussions Need a Colossal Dose of Humility</title><link>http://original.antiwar.com/shane_smith/2016/01/15/us-foreign-policy-discussions-need-a-colossal-dose-of-humility/#IDComment1010392985</link><description>Brian is correct. GO HOME YANKS and stay there was a common slogan in my youth. A lot of trouble could be saved if the USA would mind its own business.  </description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2016 17:21:03 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://original.antiwar.com/shane_smith/2016/01/15/us-foreign-policy-discussions-need-a-colossal-dose-of-humility/#IDComment1010392985</guid></item><item>
<author>GeorgyOrwell</author><title>GeorgyOrwell - Caught With Our Pants Down in the Gulf</title><link>http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2016/01/14/caught-with-our-pants-down-in-the-gulf/#IDComment1010391057</link><description>Your bullshit-ometer should be making an awful racket in response to the shifting explanations given for the twenty-four-hour Iranian hostage scare involving two ------- It&amp;#039;s amazing how Justin&amp;#039;s bullshit-ometer functions just perfectly on everything except 9/11? </description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2016 16:46:22 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2016/01/14/caught-with-our-pants-down-in-the-gulf/#IDComment1010391057</guid></item><item>
<author>follyofwar</author><title>follyofwar - GOP Debates Are Pure Hawk Without&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;Paul</title><link>http://original.antiwar.com/lucy/2016/01/15/gop-debates-are-pure-hawk-without-a-paul/#IDComment1010386524</link><description>eric - If you can put up with that debate from three losers, you have one hellova strong stomach.  I can&amp;#039;t imagine watching Scary Carly getting 1/3rd of the air time.  My head would explode. </description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2016 15:17:09 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://original.antiwar.com/lucy/2016/01/15/gop-debates-are-pure-hawk-without-a-paul/#IDComment1010386524</guid></item><item>
<author>Andrewp111</author><title>Andrewp111 - Caught With Our Pants Down in the Gulf</title><link>http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2016/01/14/caught-with-our-pants-down-in-the-gulf/#IDComment1010386406</link><description>How do we know those boats actually entered Iranian waters?  They could have been hugging the Saudi coast and grabbed by an Iranian raiding party. After all, Iran and Saudi Arabia are practically at war. The official story is all lies and cover-ups, so this narrative is as good as any other until we have more real facts. </description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2016 15:14:59 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2016/01/14/caught-with-our-pants-down-in-the-gulf/#IDComment1010386406</guid></item><item>
<author>JoeyB</author><title>JoeyB - After Me, the Jihad</title><link>http://original.antiwar.com/dan_sanchez/2016/01/15/after-me-the-jihad/#IDComment1010386153</link><description>The guy knew what Jihad was as do I and many others.  At times he supported it and he kept a tight leash on it.  It&amp;#039;s&amp;#039; not hard to predict the future based on that knowledge.  Perhaps you should attempt to educate yourself as well. </description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2016 15:09:53 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://original.antiwar.com/dan_sanchez/2016/01/15/after-me-the-jihad/#IDComment1010386153</guid></item><item>
<author>Andrewp111</author><title>Andrewp111 - Caught With Our Pants Down in the Gulf</title><link>http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2016/01/14/caught-with-our-pants-down-in-the-gulf/#IDComment1010386051</link><description>We don&amp;#039;t actually know that those boats were grabbed in Iranian waters. Everything else in the official story (stories) is a lie, so why not that?  </description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2016 15:08:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2016/01/14/caught-with-our-pants-down-in-the-gulf/#IDComment1010386051</guid></item><item>
<author>csmallo</author><title>csmallo - After Me, the Jihad</title><link>http://original.antiwar.com/dan_sanchez/2016/01/15/after-me-the-jihad/#IDComment1010384344</link><description>Kick the US out of the UN?  Oh no! Don&amp;#039;t throw us in that briar patch!   Can you remove the UN from the US while you are at it? </description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2016 14:34:23 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://original.antiwar.com/dan_sanchez/2016/01/15/after-me-the-jihad/#IDComment1010384344</guid></item><item>
<author>RyanSmurfy</author><title>RyanSmurfy - GOP Debates Are Pure Hawk Without&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;Paul</title><link>http://original.antiwar.com/lucy/2016/01/15/gop-debates-are-pure-hawk-without-a-paul/#IDComment1010383911</link><description>Rand Paul has been a transparent foreign policy opportunist.  The Donald has been mostly a foreign policy realist, similar to Pitchfork Pat Buchanan.  Another realist, Scott McConnell wrote: Trump recently &amp;quot;answered a question about how we should &amp;#039;bring stability&amp;#039; to the Middle East by stating that we&amp;rsquo;d been trying very hard to do that for 15 years without much success and that America&amp;rsquo;s roads and bridges were falling apart and in dire need or repair. Be assured that no other candidate in the GOP field answers a foreign-policy question like that.&amp;quot;  Trump often offers Eisenhower realism: peace through diplomacy backed by military strength, protected borders, and a prosperous nationalistic peace economy at home.  These policies eliminated wars for Eisenhower and for contemporary China, a nation that trades for resources instead of fighting for them.  If -- and this is a big if -- Trump sticks to Eisenhower realism, he is America&amp;#039;s best hope for peace. </description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2016 14:26:02 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://original.antiwar.com/lucy/2016/01/15/gop-debates-are-pure-hawk-without-a-paul/#IDComment1010383911</guid></item><item>
<author>Dukeybabe</author><title>Dukeybabe - Diana Johnstone Dissects Hillary, Queen of Chaos</title><link>http://original.antiwar.com/john-v-walsh/2015/12/07/diana-johnstone-dissects-hillary-queen-of-chaos/#IDComment1010382607</link><description>What always bothers me is the MSM is still pimping for Hillary. I truly believe She could kill someone on TV and MSM would have a justification ready. I would hope that presidential candidates would be vetted property so that we end up with the best person.  </description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2016 13:59:15 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://original.antiwar.com/john-v-walsh/2015/12/07/diana-johnstone-dissects-hillary-queen-of-chaos/#IDComment1010382607</guid></item><item>
<author>follyofwar</author><title>follyofwar - Caught With Our Pants Down in the Gulf</title><link>http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2016/01/14/caught-with-our-pants-down-in-the-gulf/#IDComment1010379573</link><description>@nomore - It is truly frightening that you might be right on Trump.  On the other hand, we know what we are going to get with all the other &amp;quot;viable&amp;quot; candidates. At least with Trump, as I heard from one of those faux news talking heads, he&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;like a box of chocolates, you  never know what you&amp;#039;re going to get.&amp;quot; (appropriate attribution was made to &amp;quot;Forrest Gump&amp;quot;). </description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2016 13:05:17 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2016/01/14/caught-with-our-pants-down-in-the-gulf/#IDComment1010379573</guid></item><item>
<author>archer</author><title>archer - Caught With Our Pants Down in the Gulf</title><link>http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2016/01/14/caught-with-our-pants-down-in-the-gulf/#IDComment1010378090</link><description>The U.S. wanted  them to be killed or fired on to instigate a reason for war with Iran, it&amp;#039;s the only thing  that makes any sense. </description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2016 12:39:01 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2016/01/14/caught-with-our-pants-down-in-the-gulf/#IDComment1010378090</guid></item><item>
<author>anytime</author><title>anytime - After Me, the Jihad</title><link>http://original.antiwar.com/dan_sanchez/2016/01/15/after-me-the-jihad/#IDComment1010367374</link><description>IT is always KILL KILL KILL for them </description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2016 10:04:36 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://original.antiwar.com/dan_sanchez/2016/01/15/after-me-the-jihad/#IDComment1010367374</guid></item><item>
<author>anytime</author><title>anytime - After Me, the Jihad</title><link>http://original.antiwar.com/dan_sanchez/2016/01/15/after-me-the-jihad/#IDComment1010367103</link><description>Just leave these Countrys alone do not interfere but then let it be done to America/France/Britain we will have WW3 4 and five </description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2016 10:03:10 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://original.antiwar.com/dan_sanchez/2016/01/15/after-me-the-jihad/#IDComment1010367103</guid></item><item>
<author>anytime</author><title>anytime - After Me, the Jihad</title><link>http://original.antiwar.com/dan_sanchez/2016/01/15/after-me-the-jihad/#IDComment1010365959</link><description>OK jerk off </description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2016 09:59:25 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://original.antiwar.com/dan_sanchez/2016/01/15/after-me-the-jihad/#IDComment1010365959</guid></item><item>
<author>anytime</author><title>anytime - After Me, the Jihad</title><link>http://original.antiwar.com/dan_sanchez/2016/01/15/after-me-the-jihad/#IDComment1010365850</link><description>Dream on BUB </description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2016 09:59:02 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://original.antiwar.com/dan_sanchez/2016/01/15/after-me-the-jihad/#IDComment1010365850</guid></item><item>
<author>eric siverson </author><title>eric siverson  - GOP Debates Are Pure Hawk Without&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;Paul</title><link>http://original.antiwar.com/lucy/2016/01/15/gop-debates-are-pure-hawk-without-a-paul/#IDComment1010361251</link><description>Well Bernie sounded better on the return of our navy boys where every single republican sounded totally stupid .  No wonder Obama beat them in 2 elections . </description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2016 08:31:51 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://original.antiwar.com/lucy/2016/01/15/gop-debates-are-pure-hawk-without-a-paul/#IDComment1010361251</guid></item><item>
<author>eric siverson </author><title>eric siverson  - GOP Debates Are Pure Hawk Without&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;Paul</title><link>http://original.antiwar.com/lucy/2016/01/15/gop-debates-are-pure-hawk-without-a-paul/#IDComment1010361080</link><description>Yes you are right , although I like the kiddy debate just as much as the big dogs . </description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2016 08:27:43 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://original.antiwar.com/lucy/2016/01/15/gop-debates-are-pure-hawk-without-a-paul/#IDComment1010361080</guid></item>	</channel></rss>